pick a scenario and make a decision based on it

I’m trying to study for my English course and I need some help to understand this question.

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 8; review previous chapters
    • Ruggiero, V. R. (2012). Thinking critically about ethical issues (8th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
    • type in book title, then google books, once you click the link, go the search bar and search the chapters as needed. make sure to use book in paper AND 2 scholarly sources.
  • Lesson
  • Link (file): Memo Template. (ATTACHED BELOW)
  • You Decide (See page in Week 6) (ATTACHED IN PICTURES)
  • Minimum of 2 scholarly sources

Instructions
This assignment presents a difficult and painful medical dilemma, with you in an imagined professional role. Go through the You Decide scenario and make the decision it calls for. Then, compose an official memorandum that will be kept for the record and could potentially be read not only by your Peer Review Committee but also by those involved in charitable fundraising, which supports hospital development, as well as by others with financial interests in the decision.

In the memo (use the Memo Template), explain your decision and your reasoning for it. Include the following:

  • Who benefits from what you decided? Explain why.
  • Who gets denied a needed benefit? Explain why.

You will see notice that there is time pressure in the simulated situation, so remember that you would not have the luxury to dawdle in the decision-making process, and as the decision maker, you would not have the luxury of consulting a broad spectrum of advisors. It falls on you to decide!

Include in the memo the utilitarian ethical philosophy of John Stuart Mill (from the lesson last week) and one other ethical philosopher of your choosing that we have studied to date. Use both of those philosophies to bolster your decision.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Grading
This activity will be graded based on Ethical Analysis Grading Rubric.

Rubric

Week 5

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemo format

5.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhich patient was chosen and why.

15.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhy the other patients were rejected.

15.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMill analysis

20.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2nd philosopher’s analysis

20.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

WHY SHOULD YOU HIRE EXPERT ACADEMIC WRITERS?

Answering this question is not essay as it seems. It will require you to research or burn your brain power, write your findings down, edit, proofread severally, and submit unsure of the grade you will get. Assignist.com assignment writers are offering to take care of that. Order your assignment now, relax, submit, and enjoy excellent grades. We guarantee you 100% original answers, timely delivery, and some free products.

>>ORDER NOW<<

>>SEE TOP WRITERS<<