WEIGHTING: 40% WORD COUNT: 1000 WORDS DUE DATE: WEEK 7 WEDNESDAY 2ND SEPTEMBER 2015, BY 5PM SUBMISSION DETAILS: ONLINE, REFER TO SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (P.24) MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS:
SEE P.18 AIM OF ASSESSMENT THE PURPOSE OF THIS ASSESSMENT IS TO FACILITATE STUDENT LEARNING AND CRITICAL REFLECTION THROUGH THE USE OF GUIDED QUESTIONS THAT ASSIST THE STUDENT IN IDENTIFYING HOW THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY APPLIES TO PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE.
Weighting: 40% Word count: 1000 words Due date: Week 7 Wednesday 2nd September 2015, by 5pm Submission details: Online, Refer to Submission Requirements (p.24) Marking criteria and standards: See p.18 Aim of assessment The purpose of this assessment is to facilitate student learning and critical reflection through the use of guided questions that assist the student in identifying how the regulatory framework for nursing and midwifery applies to professional practice. The assessment provides students with a discipline specific case study drawn from the Nurses and Midwives Tribunal of New South Wales professional disciplinary proceedings. Details The assessment requires students to use a set of guided questions to analyse a discipline specific case study drawn from the Nurses and Midwives Board of New South Wales publication, Adrian, A., &Chiarella, M. (2010). Professional Conduct: A case book of disciplinary decisions relating to professional conduct matters (2nd ed.), which is available on the vUWS site for the unit. Nursing discipline specific case study: NICHOLLS –NT260600CVN. See the following sections of the Case Book (2010): Appendix Part A. Tribunal case summary: pp. 410-411 Chapter 5. Professional misconduct: Knowledge, pp. 184-186; Judgment, pp. 212-213; Organisational culture, p. 314-315. Midwifery discipline specific case study: LECKY-THOMPSON #1 –NT71298DMGWLT. See the following sections of the Case Book (2010): Appendix Part A. Tribunal case summary: pp. 389-390. See also pp.390-393. Chapter 5. Professional misconduct: Skill, pp. 199-204; Judgment, pp. 213-214; Deceptive conduct, pp. 246-248. 401021 – Being a Professional Nurse or Midwife Learning Guide – Spring 2015 ©School of Nursing and Midwifery Page 17 of 37 University of Western Sydney Guided questions: 1. What were the consequences of action/inaction in this case? Your answer should include: • A concise summary outline from the Case Book (2010) of the consequences of the actions or inactions by the nurse or midwife concerned in relation to professional practice. • The Case Book (2010) describes professional conduct under sub-headings in each chapter such as knowledge, skill, judgment, care, boundary violations and ethical conduct. Students may find these sub-headings useful in writing their summary of the case. 2. What professional standards apply/were breached in this situation? • Your answer will involve reading through the NMBA Codes, Standards and Guides to identify the relevant statements that apply in the discipline specific case study. • Provide a clear and concise rationale for your selection. Your answer must be specific to the case study context. The NMBA documents are available on the vUWS site for the unit. 3. What professional behaviours may have made a difference in this situation? • Your discussion needs to be focused and relevant to the case study. In writing your answer, consider such contributory factors as their level of engagement, personal attributes, knowledge base, clinical experience, and evidence of clinical reasoning, their clinical actions, and whether the nurse or midwife involved evaluated or reflected on the care they provided. • See Dempsey et al. (2014) Chapter 14, and read through the sections on the ‘context of thoughtful practice’ and ‘clinical reasoning’ pp. 254-263. See also the strategies that nurses and midwives can apply that are listed in the Case Book (2010) p. 323. 4. What do you learn from this case study about your own preparedness for professional practice? Your answer should relate to the scope of practice for a graduate nurse or midwife.
The post WEIGHTING: 40% WORD COUNT: 1000 WORDS DUE DATE: WEEK 7 WEDNESDAY 2ND SEPTEMBER 2015, BY 5PM SUBMISSION DETAILS: ONLINE, REFER TO SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (P.24) MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS: appeared first on cheap nursing papers.
Did you know you can hire someone to answer this question? Yes, assignist.com is a hub of paper writers, dedicated to completing research and summaries, critical thinking tasks, essays, coursework, and other homework tasks. It is simple as ABC.